by Guest » Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:27 pm
No, mathematics does not have a "fatal flaw". Kurt Koedel showed that any system of axioms, large enough to include the natural numbers, is either "inconsistent" or "incomplete". "Inconsistent" means it is possible to prove, using those axioms, both a statement and its contradiction. THAT might well be a "fatal flaw". It would mean that "proving" a statement doesn't really mean anything. But the evidence so far is that proofs DO mean something! It is far more likely that the axiom systems used in mathematics are "incomplete"- that is, that there exist some statement that can neither be proved nor disproved. That is NOT a "fatal flaw". If we find such a statement (and this has happened- the "parallel postulate", for example) we just add it to our axiom set.