If someone asks you why the Riemann Hypothesis (RH) is true

[Guest]

Please tell them that RH is true in accordance with the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic...

Wow! The devil is not knowing the details (...)!

[Guest]

Hah! RH + Δ where Δ [tex]\in[/tex] (0, [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]] is also in accordance with the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic!

[Guest]

Hah! RH + Δ where Δ [tex]\in[/tex] (0, [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]] is also in accordance with the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic!

Yes! But Δ = 0 is optimal! ...

The 'devil' is not knowing the details (...)!

[Guest]

Hah! RH + Δ where Δ [tex]\in[/tex] (0, [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]] is also in accordance with the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic!

Yes! But Δ = 0 is optimal! ...

The 'devil' is not knowing the details (...)!

Moreover, what is optimal is also the truth!

[Guest]

Okay! I get it!

RH is all about detecting primes and nontrivial zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function in the best way possible in accordance with the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic.

And for every distinct prime, there is a distinct nontrivial zero associated with it.

And that's the truth!

[Guest]

Okay! I get it!

RH is all about detecting primes and nontrivial zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function in the best way possible in accordance with the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic.

And for every distinct prime, there is a distinct nontrivial zero associated with it.

And that's the truth!

The approximate nontrivial zeros, z [tex]= \frac{1}{2} \pm 14.1i[/tex] are associated with the prime, 2.

The approximate nontrivial zeros, z [tex]= \frac{1}{2} \pm 21.0i[/tex] are associated with the prime, 3.

The approximate nontrivial zeros, z [tex]= \frac{1}{2} \pm 25.0i[/tex] are associated with the prime, 5.

The approximate nontrivial zeros, z [tex]= \frac{1}{2} \pm 30.4i[/tex] are associated with the prime, 7.

The approximate nontrivial zeros, z [tex]= \frac{1}{2} \pm 32.9i[/tex] are associated with the prime, 11.

The approximate nontrivial zeros, z [tex]= \frac{1}{2} \pm 37.6i[/tex] are associated with the prime, 13.

The approximate nontrivial zeros, z [tex]= \frac{1}{2} \pm 40.9i[/tex] are associated with the prime, 17.

...

[Guest]

Hah! RH + Δ where Δ [tex]\in[/tex] (0, [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]] is also in accordance with the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic!

Yes! But Δ = 0 is optimal! ...

The 'devil' is not knowing the details (...)!

Moreover, what is optimal is also the truth!

Remark: The notation, RH + Δ, indicates Re(z) [tex]= \frac{1}{2}[/tex] + Δ ...