A formula to describe the prime numbers

[Guest]

Hi I wrote a paper involving prime numbers and I believe that I ended up deriving a formula for the set of prime numbers.




What I am proposing is that the next prime number exists within 2 formulas simultaneously with only a random probably of it occurring in either formula on any given calculation. It also states that the next prime number can't be calculated directly since the Pn+2 term is needed to generate the next prime number.

However with this formula you can still calculate approximations for the next prime number.

[Guest]

Hi I wrote a paper involving prime numbers and I believe that I ended up deriving a formula for the set of prime numbers.




What I am proposing is that the next prime number exists within 2 formulas simultaneously with only a random probably of it occurring in either formula on any given calculation. It also states that the next prime number can't be calculated directly since the Pn+2 term is needed to generate the next prime number.

However with this formula you can still calculate approximations for the next prime number.

Hah! We are not impressed since for all successive odd prime numbers we know that the following basic statement is true:

[tex]p_{n+2 } =p_{n+1} + 2k[/tex]

for some positive integer, k, such that

[tex]1\le k < \infty[/tex].

[Guest]

Hi I wrote a paper involving prime numbers and I believe that I ended up deriving a formula for the set of prime numbers.




What I am proposing is that the next prime number exists within 2 formulas simultaneously with only a random probably of it occurring in either formula on any given calculation. It also states that the next prime number can't be calculated directly since the Pn+2 term is needed to generate the next prime number.

However with this formula you can still calculate approximations for the next prime number.

Hah! We are not impressed since for all successive odd prime numbers we know that the following basic statement is true:

[tex]p_{n+2 } =p_{n+1} + 2k[/tex]

for some positive integer, k, such that

[tex]1\le k < \infty[/tex].

Is [tex]max (2k) << p_{n+1}[/tex]?

[Guest]

What is f here .. and what.. tell more. No link to paper or nothing.

[Guest]

A more simple one is:

[tex]z=n!/n^2[/tex]

where from [tex]n>4[/tex] IF [tex]n[/tex] is a prime

then [tex]z\in\mathbb{Q-N}[/tex]

[Guest]

A more simple one is:

[tex]z=n!/n^2[/tex]

where from [tex]n>4[/tex] IF [tex]n[/tex] is a prime

then [tex]z\in\mathbb{Q-N}[/tex]

[Guest]

The discussion of this mathematical problem is fascinating. Those who want to find the best approaches to the solution will be delighted. Such topics help to develop logical thinking. It can be difficult for me to do something like this. I sometimes use edubirdie.com to organize material or work with complex tasks, which makes it easier to structure and find the information I need. In this discussion, I realized how important it is to share your thoughts because you can improve your ideas with the help of others.