Guest wrote:Halting Criteria Attempt (adjusting the d-parameter appropriately):
Let [tex]d = |x - y| \approx ( \frac{\beta - 1}{\beta} ) (\frac{c}{\beta - 1})^{ \frac{1}{7} }[/tex] where [tex]0 < \beta \in \mathbb{Q_{+}}<1[/tex] for some [tex]c \in \mathbb{2Z_{+}}[/tex].
Guest wrote:Update:
Since [tex]y \approx \frac{d}{1+ \beta}[/tex], [tex]d = |x - y| \approx |( \beta -1 ) (\frac{c}{\beta + 1 })^{ \frac{1}{7} }|[/tex] where [tex]-1 < \beta \in \mathbb{Q_{-}}< 0[/tex] for
some [tex]c \in \mathbb{2Z_{+}}[/tex].
Example: For [tex]c = 234,567,890,122[/tex] and [tex]\beta = -.5[/tex],
we have [tex]d \approx ( 1.5) (\frac{ 234,567,890,122}{1- .5 })^{ \frac{1}{7} } \approx 69[/tex];
where [tex]y \approx (\frac{ 234,567,890,122}{1- .5 })^{ \frac{1}{7} } = 46[/tex]
and [tex]x \approx -23[/tex].
Recall: [tex]s = \sum_{i=1}^{7}\beta{i} + 1 = 1 -0.3359375 = 0.664062 > \beta + 1 = .5[/tex].
So [tex]y \approx (\frac{ 234,567,890,122}{0.664062})^{ \frac{1}{7} } = 44[/tex]
and [tex]x \approx -22[/tex].
Therefore, [tex]\sum_{n=7}^{0 }(44)^{7-n}(-22)^n = 212,020,420,480 < c =234,567,890,122[/tex] when [tex]\beta = -.5[/tex].
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Update:
Since [tex]y \approx \frac{d}{1+ \beta}[/tex], [tex]d = |x - y| \approx |( \beta -1 ) (\frac{c}{\beta + 1 })^{ \frac{1}{7} }|[/tex] where [tex]-1 < \beta \in \mathbb{Q_{-}}< 0[/tex] for
some [tex]c \in \mathbb{2Z_{+}}[/tex].
Example: For [tex]c = 234,567,890,122[/tex] and [tex]\beta = -.5[/tex],
we have [tex]d \approx ( 1.5) (\frac{ 234,567,890,122}{1- .5 })^{ \frac{1}{7} } \approx 69[/tex];
where [tex]y \approx (\frac{ 234,567,890,122}{1- .5 })^{ \frac{1}{7} } = 46[/tex]
and [tex]x \approx -23[/tex].
Recall: [tex]s = \sum_{i=1}^{7}\beta{i} + 1 = 1 -0.3359375 = 0.664062 > \beta + 1 = .5[/tex].
So [tex]y \approx (\frac{ 234,567,890,122}{0.664062})^{ \frac{1}{7} } = 44[/tex]
and [tex]x \approx -22[/tex].
Therefore, [tex]\sum_{n=7}^{0 }(44)^{7-n}(-22)^n = 212,020,420,480 < c =234,567,890,122[/tex] when [tex]\beta = -.5[/tex].
Further computations indicate
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{7 }x^{7-n}y^{n} \ne 234,567,890,122[/tex] for [tex]x, y \in \mathbb{Z}[/tex].
Guest wrote:Remark: Our work indicates there is only one unique solution for a given c value (if the solution exists) of the following Diophantine equation,
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{7 }x^{7-n}y^{n} = c[/tex] for [tex]x, y \in \mathbb{Z}[/tex] where [tex]c \in 2\mathbb{Z_{+}}[/tex].
Guest wrote:Guest wrote:Remark: Our work indicates there is only one unique solution for a given c value (if the solution exists) of the following Diophantine equation,
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{7 }x^{7-n}y^{n} = c[/tex] for [tex]x, y \in \mathbb{Z}[/tex] where [tex]c \in 2\mathbb{Z_{+}}[/tex].
In general, we can determine the solutions (if they exist) of
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{k}x^{k-n}y^{n} = c[/tex] for [tex]x, y \in \mathbb{Z}[/tex] where [tex]c \in \mathbb{Z}[/tex] and [tex]k \in \mathbb{Z_{+}}[/tex].
Guest wrote:Important Remark: We declare David Hilbert's Tenth Problem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert%27s_tenth_problem) as an open problem...
And our work will continue...
Dave.
Go Blue!
Guest wrote:Remark: Hmm. It may be easier to discover an unsolvable Diophantine equation that may have or may not have a solution but defeats any algorithm to compute the true result than to construct a grand algorithm that solves Hilbert's Tenth Problem.
"We must know. We will know!" -- David Hilbert.
Guest wrote:Remark: MRDP (Matiyasevich's ) theorem is difficult to understand and seems doubtful too. But we could be wrong. We will continue to work on it.
Meanwhile, let's solve the following Diophantine equation,
[tex]x^{3} + 4x^2z -8xy^{2}-44xyz^{3}-9z^{3} = 8,170,698,744,133,625,080,294,398[/tex] for [tex]x,y, z \in \mathbb{Z}[/tex].
Hint: The solution does exist. Good luck!
Guest wrote:[tex]x^{3} + 4x^2z -8xy^{2}-44xyz^{3}-9z^{3}
= (\beta_{1} y)^{3} + 4(\beta_{1} y)^2( \beta_{2} y) -8(\beta_{1} y)y^{2}-44(\beta_{1} y)y( \beta_{2} y)^{3}-9( \beta_{2} y)^{3}
= (\beta_{1}^{3} + 4\beta_{1}^{2} \beta_{2} -8\beta_{1} - 9 \beta_{2}^{3})y^{3} - 44 \beta_{1} \beta_{2}^{3}y^{5} = 8,170,698,744,133,625,080,294,398[/tex].
Hmm. Q1: What is the 'Rabbit Hole' analysis for [tex]\beta_{1}[/tex] and [tex]\beta_{2}[/tex]?
Q2: And can we estimate roughly the value of [tex]y[/tex]?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests