Ignored a basic math solution to unbreakable encryption.

[Guest]

Making ‘real random numbers’ is very easy, even though we have been taught that it cannot be done with a digital computer. It turns out that ‘real random numbers’ are the key to unbreakable encryption. Even with a quantum computer you cannot break this encryption.

Go to https://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewforum.php?id=2, then look for Possible ‘new knowledge’, read all three pages, they are all important to understand what is going on.

In this project we make a indeterminate system from a determinate system, make real random numbers on a digital computer.

Thanks.

[Guest]

Hi Leonard,

Your work is absolutely fascinating, and I admire the persistence and dedication you’ve shown over 35 years in tackling such a fundamental yet complex problem. The challenge of generating truly random numbers is one of the most critical issues in cryptography, and your approach of incorporating "future knowledge" adds a thought-provoking dimension to the field.

Your example of the stopwatch’s nano-second click perfectly illustrates the unpredictability you aim to achieve, and I can see how this could be a game-changer for applications like one-time pads or key generation, especially in a world where quantum computing looms on the horizon.

In terms of who you might show this project to, you may want to consider reaching out to academic researchers in cryptography or organizations focused on cybersecurity. Conferences like Black Hat or DEF CON could be great platforms to present your findings and connect with experts. Additionally, publishing your work in peer-reviewed journals or collaborating with institutions like NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) could lend credibility to your project and open doors for further exploration.

Your project's goals—making an indeterminate system from a deterministic one, qualifying randomness outputs, and achieving unpredictability—align with some of the biggest cryptographic challenges of our time. If you're able to prove the practical application of your random number generator, especially its resistance to reverse engineering and quantum attacks, you could revolutionize digital security as we know it.

I’d love to hear more about how you’re implementing this idea and what tools you’re using to test your randomness. Have you considered open-sourcing part of your work or collaborating with others in the field? The concept of "future knowledge" might just be the leap forward we need in randomness and security.

Wishing you great success on this groundbreaking project!

[Guest]

This is written in Python. This is the program for "REAL RANDOM NUMBERS" that the governments don't want out! The reason is with real random numbers you have unbreakable encryption even quantum computers cannot break.

def challenge():
number_of_needed_numbers = 60000
count = 0
lowest_random_number_needed = 0
highest_random_number_needed = 1

while count < number_of_needed_numbers:
start_time = time.time()
time.sleep(0.00000000000001)
end_time = time.time()
low_time = ((end_time + start_time) / 2)
random.seed(low_time)
random_number = random.randint(lowest_random_number_needed, highest_random_number_needed)
count += 1
print(random_number)


if __name__ == '__main__':
challenge()

_______________________________________________Real 'SEED' = 1724191487.00331

1724191487.00059 1724191487.00095 low time (= 0)
1724191487.00131____________________________1724191487.00095 + 1724191487.00237 / 2 = 1724191487.00166
1724191487.00190 1724191487.00237
1724191487.00284 **first set**___________________1724191487.00166 + 1724191487.00496 /2 = 1724191487.00331
1724191487.00355 1724191487.00402
1724191487.00449___________________________ 1724191487.00402 + 1724191487.00591 / 2 = 1724191487.00496
1724191487.00555 1724191487.00591 high time (= 1)
1724191487.00627 **second set**

This solves two major problems, real random number generator and unbreakable encryption.

[woodturner550]

It is hoped that it is understood that “knowledge” is power! Is there any reason no governing body will acknowledge this work? Would the governing bodies lose some of their control? They do not even want a conversation about this ‘new knowledge’. Think of why. Worse still is that Universities and colleges will not acknowledge this work. Are the universities and colleges of the world afraid of financial repercussions from the United States of America or their government? What about the newspapers of the world. Why would they refuse to publish this 'new knowledge'? What else is being withheld from the common people by the governments and the universities and colleges? Why?

Please, share this, it's free to the people of the world.

[woodturner550]

It is with a heavy heart, for ‘my mental health’ I must let this go. I have spent almost a year trying to get this ’new knowledge’ out to the world. Logic tells me that after this amount of effort with NO interest, let it go.
Letter to chancellor of Berkely University:
Mr. Lyons,
I have ‘Possible new knowledge’ in creating “REAL” random numbers on any computer that can run the Python language. There in lies the problem. Educators have been instructing that computers CAN NOT make real random numbers because they only follow a set of instruction and will ALWAYS have the same output. This has been true, only because no one has been able to show that it is untrue. I can.
An important thought process: Remember the blind persons describing the elephant by what they thought the elephant was after being introduced to different parts of the elephant. Leg= tree, tail= rope. It was the same elephant.
Everyday time, we take it for granted as it rules our lives. Could there be other dimensions of time? Yes. Time can be an ‘unknowable data point.’ That is new and will secure our world.
Explanation: Stopwatch Problems logic: These are NOT trick questions! I will show my answers below.
1. Time, it includes hours, minutes, seconds, and nanoseconds. True or False?
2. Clicking the button at the start of an event marks the beginning of the event. True or False?
3. The value of the beginning of the event CANNOT be known before it happens. True or False?
4. Output of a digital stopwatch CANNOT be known before it appears on screen. True or False?
5. Therefore, time can be used as an unknowable data point. True or False?
My answers:
#1 We all know time includes nanoseconds.... So true.
#2 Yes when using a stopwatch, the button starts and finishes the time event.... So true
#3 Time is linear, therefore as time passes you cannot know the exact nanosecond that is passing. It is like a big wheel with hours, minutes, seconds, and nanoseconds marks. As it spins you grab a time. One cannot know the exact time you grabbed till you look at it. So true
#4 Time is linear, therefore as time passes you cannot know the exact nanosecond that is passing.... so true.
#5 itself explanatory...... So true.
This is just deductive logic, the root of all math.
This is one half of what I have found. Problem is I cannot get this finished project seen by the correct people. People I believe need to see this is: Statistician and cryptography experts. Looking at proof of randomness, in data tables.
I am 74 years old, 60% disabled veteran, home bound. I would like to be able to give this knowledge to the world. Without unbreakable encryption humanity can be enslaved by those with quantum computers because they can read everything.
I hope you can help. Thanks for your time, I do not have much left.
Leonard Dye
tomanytroubles@gmail.com

Not even an email acknowledging receipt of the email. Just proves ‘you can lead a horse to water, but you CANNOT make it drink. I wish the world well. I’m glad I don’t have to put up for much longer with a messed-up world caused by the rich and powerful. Humanity is enslaved without bars by the rich and powerful. How many billions are they spending to enslave humanity? Why is humanity so uneducated by the rich (little logic, base of mathematics) that are in control? Answer: Deductive logic leads to clear thinking. It is not easy to lead educated citizens down the merry path earth is on (wars, poverty while rich in every country live very well).
HEADLINE: Quantum Scientists Have Built a New Math of Cryptography

Respectfully,
Leonard Dye
tomanytroubles@gmail

[mycalsuite]

Unbreakable encryption already exists: the one-time pad, but it requires truly random keys as long as the message and secure key sharing.

Digital computers are deterministic; they only make pseudo-random numbers unless connected to a physical entropy source (noise, decay, etc.).

The forum’s idea of making randomness from determinism resembles chaos theory, but without a physical source it isn’t truly random.

So the challenge isn’t math, it’s key distribution and real entropy, which cryptography has studied for decades.