by Guest » Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:36 pm
Two questions : ...Your questions....
I rechecked the problem statement about the diameter - the pond is a rectangle about the same diameter with the garden. Would that change the outcome ?
Reply.... I assumed a typing error and the closest I assumed was..."same shape"...meaning similar in shape....as in similar triangles etc.
Diameter....normally refers to distance across a circle passing through the centre, or at least the distance across any object passing through its centre.
This doesnt have any meaning I can see for the question posted since the garden is rectangular and rectangular pond.....and does not help in any way.
What we need to know for the question is the relationship between the linear dimensions of the sides of the pond and the area of the pond.
We are told the area of the pond is 1/9 of the garden.....and this was not clear in the question either so I assumed it to be 1/9 of the original area.
We were also told the perimeter of the pond was 200 yards less than the garden but we did not know anything about the lengths of the pond sides or how they related to the garden. We could have been told the pond was circular then we could have worked out the perimeter form the area. Similarily if we had been told it was square the length of the sides would have been the sq root of the area. But no information was forthcoming so I assumed the pond to have a similar shape to the garden. As in similar triangles corresponding sides of the pond will then have same ratio of length to corresponding sides of the garden, and similarily the ratio of corresponding areas will be the "sides ratio squared". So 1/3L x 1/3W = 1/9LW. So if pond area is 1/9 then sides length is 1/3.
I had reversed x and y - x being the shorter side and y being the longer side. Would that change the outcome ?
Reply.... No, reversing x and y would not change the outcome of the solution provided you followed your work through correctly. x and y are just indicators for the unknowns and could be A and B OR L and W that I used.