by Guest » Sun Jun 30, 2019 7:04 am
You have an "eight day" schedule and a "seven day" schedule. Since eight days is not divisible by 7, I don't think a "eight week" schedule is appropriate. The least common multiple of 8 and 7 is 56 or 8 seven day weeks. With 8 weeks, a person on the eight day schedule would be paid 8(1254)= \$10032. In 56 days, a person working "6 days on and 2 days off", the "eight day" schedule, will have worked 7 "rotations", working 7(6)= 42 days and having 7(2)= 14 days off, so making 10032/42= \$238.86 per working day. A person working "4 days on and 3 days off, the "seven day" schedule", will be paid 8(955.44)= 7643.52 and will have worked 8(4)= 32 days and having 8(3)= 24 days off so making 7643.52/32= $238.86 per working day. There is no change in daily pay. On the other hand, on this new schedule, they will be working fewer days so making less total money. That might be more important to them than "pay per day".
You have an "eight day" schedule and a "seven day" schedule. Since eight days is not divisible by 7, I don't think a "eight week" schedule is appropriate. The least common multiple of 8 and 7 is 56 or 8 seven day weeks. With 8 weeks, a person on the eight day schedule would be paid 8(1254)= \$10032. In 56 days, a person working "6 days on and 2 days off", the "eight day" schedule, will have worked 7 "rotations", working 7(6)= 42 days and having 7(2)= 14 days off, so making 10032/42= \$238.86 per working day. A person working "4 days on and 3 days off, the "seven day" schedule", will be paid 8(955.44)= 7643.52 and will have worked 8(4)= 32 days and having 8(3)= 24 days off so making 7643.52/32= $238.86 per working day. There is no change in daily pay. On the other hand, on this new schedule, they will be working fewer days so making less total money. That might be more important to them than "pay per day".